Director Oz Perkins (The Blackcoat’s Daughter, Gretel & Hansel) has carved a niche for himself as a purveyor of slow, dreamlike horror steeped in dread. Longlegs, his latest film, promises to be his most ambitious project yet: a serial killer procedural dripping with Satanic overtones, shot through a grainy 90s lens, and headlined by a whispering, almost unrecognisable Nicolas Cage. On paper, it’s the stuff of cult classic dreams. In execution, though, it’s a frustratingly hollow experience that leans heavily on mood while failing to deliver emotional or narrative weight.
The story follows FBI agent Lee Harker (Maika Monroe), a socially withdrawn rookie with an uncanny intuition, as she’s pulled into a decades-long series of seemingly ritualistic family murders. The killer leaves behind cryptic notes, unsettling symbols, and almost no evidence. Harker, who has a mysterious past of her own, begins to suspect a personal connection to the case – and to the elusive killer known only as “Longlegs.”

The premise sets up a lot of potential: the occult meets the procedural, with personal stakes and eerie aesthetics. And for a while, Longlegs rides that wave of potential with style. The film is undeniably atmospheric. Perkins knows how to compose a disquieting frame, and the visual language – washed-out tones, aggressive architecture, and disturbing flashes of infernal imagery – is strong. Combined with a droning, minimalist score and frequent use of silence, there are moments where Longlegs evokes genuine unease.
But atmosphere, unfortunately, is just about all it offers. The plot unfolds at a glacial pace, and not in a deliberate, tension-building way. The story is relatively predictable and tries to evoke a sense of David Lynch by relying on ambiguity, but it ends up being more tiresome than intriguing. None of the characters are particularly compelling – it’s usually fun to watch a socially awkward genius, but Lee Harker felt like such a clear rip-off of Clarice Sterling that it all felt too familiar. Her performance is subdued to the point of being disengaged, and while that might be intentional, it doesn’t give the audience much to hold onto.

Then there’s Nicolas Cage. Much of the pre-release buzz centered around his mysterious role, and while his brief appearances are visually striking and undeniably weird, they don’t add up to much. He’s buried under makeup and vocal distortion, delivering something between modern-day Marilyn Manson and your drunk nan at Christmas. For all the build-up around his character, Longlegs himself remains disappointingly shallow: a collection of quirks without a clear psychology or thematic purpose.
This lack of substance extends to the film’s themes. Longlegs hints at big ideas – intergenerational trauma, the nature of evil, fate versus free will – but doesn’t commit to exploring them in any meaningful way. It gestures towards depth with cryptic dialogue and recurring motifs (mirrors, symbols, whispered voices), but the effect feels more like window dressing than revelation. In the end, Longlegs was pretty underwhelming, with only a few scares, 40-year-old Satanic panic horror, and a few flashes of gore.

Fans of Perkins’ earlier work may appreciate the film’s slow-burn style and elliptical storytelling, but even compared to his previous outings, Longlegs feels inert. It’s a film of eerie vibes and intriguing suggestions that ultimately fizzles out instead of building towards anything impactful. It neither delivers the visceral thrills of a great horror film nor the psychological insight of a compelling character study.
To be fair, there are moments of visual cleverness and a few genuinely unsettling sequences. But they’re fleeting – flashes of inspiration in a film that too often feels like it’s trying to convince you something profound is happening, without ever actually making it so.
Longlegs looks and sounds like a horror classic in the making, but beneath its moody surface lies a thin, unsatisfying story with little emotional or intellectual payoff. Some of the jump scares might get under your skin, but you’ll wash them off soon enough.
More Film Reviews
Shih Chun is Ho Yun-Qing, an intelligent student who fails his imperial examination and, after failing to find a respectable job well, decides to become a manuscript copyist. His minimal… A film about the intersection of sexuality with food might initially feel like a pretty out-there pitch. However, anyone casually considering the topic will find that the concepts of hunger… “The relationship between the Dolans and the Lomacks turns sour when one of them leases their land to a natural gas company. The drilling has disastrous results as it unleashes… Warning to those with mycophobia – this is not the film for you. Gaia is a South African ecological horror film, full of mushroom monsters, skin-crawling body horror and raving… Is there such a thing as a good war? After World War I, the Allies left Germany in a state of defeat and despair. Consequently, one man used the disheartened… Village of Doom is a 1983 Japanese period crime thriller, written by Bo Nishimura and Takuya Nishioka, and directed by Noboru Tanaka. Primarily working as a Roman Porno director…Legend Of The Mountain (1979) Film Review – Triumphant execution of a typical Folktale-ish Narrative
Sexual Drive (2021) Film Review – Exploring the Eroticism of Food
Unearth (2021) Film Review – Fracking Despair
Gaia (2021) Film Review: God is Real, and She’s a Fungus
Brooklyn 45 (2023) Film Review – War is Hell
Village of Doom (1983) Film Review
Jenny is a creative copywriter living just outside of Liverpool who loves horror, board games, comics, video games and industrial metal.
