It has now been 24 hours since I watched Pulse (2001), and I still find myself at a loss. It was a movie that I desperately wanted to enjoy, a cardinal sin for a reviewer who should go in with a blank slate and little expectations. The weight of preconceived notions can hang about the neck like an albatross, ultimately shattering our joys with inevitable disappointment. And It’s precisely what happened to me here.
It is not a bad movie per se. So much of it is done so well. From my understanding, some moments are held in such regard that they’re considered iconic within the J-horror canon. Having only sampled a relatively small selection of the country’s modern horror, I can’t exactly confirm this outside analysis. What I can attest that several scenes are effectively constructed, executed, and followed through as truly frightening cinema. More than once, I felt the wonderful dread that we all anticipate when viewing a good horror film.

But, As effective as these individual moments are, they’re strung together in a plot that crawls, one that seems unsure of which direction it will take. It presents a mystery that is less interesting than it realizes, then answers it halfway through, leaving to dry any remaining intrigue that isn’t otherwise lost in the confusion. The filmmakers seem to think that their creepy imagery alone will carry the film, and what they’ve sketched in between is merely a vehicle to carry us from one jolt to another. They don’t realize that the driver is asleep at the wheel and has missed several stops.
The film is about the loneliness and isolation that is brought upon by a world increasingly connected by technology. For today’s viewers, it’s an extremely prescient subtext. Pulse was made when the internet was in its relative infancy, new enough that our male lead, a university student residing in a major metropolis, is uncomfortable with computers, knows nothing of being online, and no one finds it unusual. It is an era that long predates smartphones and the dominance of social media, let alone knowledge of their effects on young users’ brains.

The thematic poignancy buoys the film’s pace to an extent. It builds a connection between our digitally immersed lives and a foreign landscape that existed only twenty years past. At its high points, the film constructs a mirror into the future, allowing the audiences to relate to events through brute reflection Its relevance has only been amplified as the years pass.
However, beyond these reflections (for which individual results may vary), we’re given no further depth to care for the characters. One is a technologically illiterate college student. Another is a computer science grad student. Others work together at what seems to be a rooftop plant nursery. As their stories eventually merge, they’re shown to love and care for one another (or at least come to do so). Yet there’s little else to latch onto beyond their narrative functions. They’re shells to which horrible things happen, and we’re meant to care precisely because what happens is horrible.

The drama is thus neutered and said drama is an interminable buffer between the horror and the story. In the end, it turns to spectacle to fill the void, which only exacerbates its flaws. An intimate horror tale becomes a disaster movie in the final minutes, a progression in which hints are casually provided throughout yet still remains hollow. A distinct lack of faith in the film’s premise explodes from its climax instead of the intended dread.
Nevertheless, I can’t help but dwell on how effective it is in parts without feeling a bit of guilt. Perhaps it was my own fault, anticipating a titan of cinema when I was merely presented with a demigod. I can’t fully dismiss the film due to a nagging feeling that something was missed. It may simply be the cult following that less discerning viewers have cultivated over the years and my desperate desire to attach myself to something new. So little captures my intrigue now, and perhaps good is no longer good enough. This now is a flaw of mine, not of the film.
More Film Reviews
“Witches don’t die before leaving their legacy.” With the Halloween season upon us, it is inherently fitting for us to start thinking about all the wonderful things that have become… Premiering at Grimmfest’s annual horror film festival, Frankie, Maniac Woman (2025), directed and co-written by Pierre Tsigaridis, director of Traumatika (2024), arrives with the promise of a searing indictment of… If you ask a casual movie goer to list some classic horror films, a large majority of them will mention Halloween, Friday the 13th, and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre. One… Biotherapy is a Japanese 1986 sci-fi horror that’s aptly described as a slasher merged into a splatter creature feature. The short movie was released as a project from the limited… The Last Horror Movie is a 2003 British found footage horror mockumentary, written by James Handel and directed by Julian Richards. Beginning his career with the award-winning shorts Pirates (1987),… The best science fiction is always built upon interesting ideas, and the best horror lives and dies with its ability to scare or unsettle. Possessor (2020), against both measures, is…Two Witches (2021) Film Review – You’re in the Dark Now
Frankie, Maniac Woman (2025) Film Review – An Irreverent Punk Scream That Loses Its Voice [Grimmfest 2025]
Deadly Games (1982) Film Review – Low-Key Slasher That Slipped Under the Radar
Biotherapy (1986) – An Unknown Japanese Sci-Fi Horror Short
The Last Horror Movie (2003) Film Review – A Character Study in Murder
Possessor (2020) Film Review – Fantastic Piece of Modern Sci-fi Horror