Bloody Sin (2011) Film Review – A Perfervid Love Letter to Exploitation

Posted on by Jim Cox
Bloody Sin 2011 Cover photo

Follow by Email
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram

Bloody Sin is a 2011 English-language Italian extreme horror film, written and directed by Domiziano Cristopharo, with additional writing from Jay Disney and Filippo Santaniello. Being particularly well-known in the Italian extreme horror scene, Domiziano is known as the creator of such films as House of Flesh Mannequins (2009), Red Krokodil (2012), and Virus: Extreme Contamination (2016), to name but a few. Whereas, Filippo Santaniello has worked as a writer on a number of titles such as Sarcophaga (2013), and The Slider (2017), and Jay Disney, mostly known as an actor, has worked on translating scripts to English, such as Shock: My Abstraction of Death (2013), and The Transparent Woman (2015).

A team of American photographers/models investigates a European castle that was used for sadistic tortures during the Inquisition, as well as horrifying and abominable Nazi experiments on innocent people. Riddled with history, the demonically possessed castle overtakes the crew, turning their nightmares into a terrifying reality.

 

An incredibly perfervid love letter to exploitation films of the ’60s and ’70s, Bloody Sin certainly captures the essence of its basis wholeheartedly. Being a literal homage to classic Italian cinema such as Bloody Pit of Horror (1965) (Il boia scarlatto) and Beyond the Darkness (1979) (Buio Omega) to name only a fraction, the film is an embodiment of Gothic horror, Christsploitation, and Nazisploitation to produce a fantastic combination of them all. The film utilises a number of tropes from the period, such as Italian actors playing Americans, ADR dubbed voices, and overtones of erotica, truly delivering an amazing representation of this classic genre.

Furthermore, with small cameos from the late Ruggero Deodato and Venantino Venantini as executioners, it could undoubtedly be argued that the film got its blessing from some of the greats of the genre.

 

Displaying the acute eye for detail Domiziano is known for in his films, Bloody Sin exhibits an incredibly sleek visual design—utilising an abundant mix of different techniques and styles throughout. From an excellent use of black & white footage to create a faux silent film aesthetic, to highly saturated, soft-focused colour film emulating the vintage cinema of the 60s and 70s, to even implementing a short piece of stop-motion animation; the film certainly accomplishes in capturing its intended styles. Additionally, the film also implements the use of split-screen cinematography, similar to The Boston Strangler (1968) or Wicked Wicked (1973). However, this technique is used in a different manner to these examples, displaying several angles of the same room rather than different perspectives.

However, where Bloody Sin suffers most is with its overtly varied performances provided by the cast. Ranging from decent to thematically campy, there are a fair few renditions that do the film solid justice and certainly play into the aesthetics. Unfortunately, there is more than one interpretation that could be considered subpar to put it politely. Whilst this isn’t exactly egregious, it is a noticeable blemish on an otherwise notable piece of cinema.

 

Both visually and ideologically representative of cult classic exploitation from its golden era, Bloody Sin certainly shows due diligence to the films that paved the way for exploitation horror thrillers. With its amazing visuals, beautiful Gothic location, and incredibly unexpected twist ending; the film is an enjoyable romp for those who gravitate towards older horror films.

score

More Extreme Cinema Reviews